Should the Lakers be Considered Favorites to win the Title?
A poll was done this past week surveying GMs across the league
asking them who would win the 2013 NBA Championship. First off, it is at the very least refreshing
to see majority of GMs honest with their teams current situations and not
immediately say their own franchise would be crowned champs in 2013 (with the
exception of 3 of course). The poll
showed that roughly 70% of General Managers in the league felt the Miami Heat
would repeat as champions, followed by 24% for the Los Angeles Lakers and 6%
for the Oklahoma City Thunder.
Those three seem like plausible choices to receive the O’Brien
in July, but the percentages are what’s interesting. Bear in mind the Miami Heat were a Boston 4th
quarter collapse from not even making the finals this past summer. They did add some nice shooters in Ray Allen
and Rashard Lewis, but their moves pale in comparison to those made by the
Lakers.
LA has added a boat load of talent
The Lakers added two eventual Hall of Famers to a team that
was already good enough to make the Western Finals last year. Looking at both lineups briefly the talent
level is at least even, one could theoretically make an argument for either Miami
or LA being the better team on paper.
Nash/Kobe/MTP/Gasol/Howard or Chalmers/Wade/James/Bosh/Anthony…it’s
certainly close…closer than 70% vs. 24%.
So why are GMs that much more sour on the Lakers chances
than the Heat? Truth is, the percentage
for LA should actually be smaller.
The Lakers have extremely efficient performers namely Pau
Gasol now joining Steve Nash and Dwight Howard in the fray. The bigger question is will they all even
have enough touches?
Kobe loves his touches
Last season Kobe Bryant occupied over 37% of the Lakers’
possessions when on the floor. Let’s do
some simple Math. There are 5 players on
the floor, so the average player should have a usage rate of 20% (100%/5). Now
the point guard brings the ball up the floor and typically starts many of the
team’s sets, so we would expect his usage rate to be above 20%, likely in that
22-23% range. If we remove that point
guard there should be roughly 77% to be split among the remaining 4 members of
the unit.
Let’s dive further. Last season the Lakers had spot-up point
guards on the floor for majority of the time (namely Steve Blake and Derek
Fisher) whose usage rates were far lower than a regular point guard, more in
the 15-18% range. Next season Steve Nash
should command a usage rate that is more typical with your average point guard,
at around 22-23% (which would be a slight dip from his Phoenix days which we
can assume since he is going to a team that won’t rely on him as much to be the
sole offensive table setter). So again,
that means 77% split among the remaining 4 players: Howard, Gasol, Peace, and
of course Mr. Bryant.
If Kobe occupies 37% of possessions then that’s 40% (77% -
37%) to be split among Howard, Gasol and Peace.
Let’s assume Peace occupies the same usage rate he did last season (roughly
15%) then that’s only 12.5% a piece for the most efficient 4/5 tandem in the
league in Gasol and Howard, far less than the league average. You may say why would Peace have any usage
rate there? Even the most defensive
minded/ off the ball 3s in the league have usage rates in double figures as
they will inevitably have a portion of the possessions run through them just by
being on the floor and playing closer to the perimeter (as Peace does).
You may be thinking that last season was an aberration for
Kobe, but the Lakers did still have the most efficient 4/5 tandem in Bynum and
Gasol and majority of possessions did not go through either of them.
Are things different now for the Lakers?
Things are a different now with Steve Nash though. If he runs the offense accordingly you better
believe Kobe will see less touches, but how much less? Also, how many less possessions would he need
to occupy for the team to be optimal in offensive efficiency?
Those answers are uncertain, but let’s think conservatively. Let’s say due to Nash and a fondness to see
Howard in the post more, Kobe’s usage rate drops to 30%. That now means 32% between Howard and Gasol,
16% each and still far less than the league average. The goal should be to have your most
efficient offensive talents see as many touches as possible, or in the Lakers’
case above league average. In order for
that to happen, Kobe would need to play primarily off the ball and drop his
usage rate all the way down to 22% (100% - 23%[Nash] – 15%[Artest] – 40%[Howard/Gasol]). Considering Kobe’s need to be a primary player
in crunch time, run perimeter ISO sets and the lack of control Coach Brown has
on the Black Mamba that seems unlikely.
Can Kobe learn the ultimate lesson?
Kobe needs to put his ego aside and take a page out of Paul
Pierce’s book in Boston. The Truth
welcomed KG and Ray Allen in the summer of 2007 not only with open arms but
with a larger share of the team’s possessions.
Pierce’s usage rate dropped dramatically that season but his true
shooting percentage increased as the big three led the Celts to their first
title in 22 years. The same could easily
be done in Los Angeles, but not if Kobe Bryant has anything to do about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment